top of page

Research Blog

Search

Okay so to provide a brief overview of my project in almost layman's terms, I am exploring the different factors that could affect the genetic diversification (rate) of West Nile virus (WNV) throughout North America most strongly. The factors that I will be/am looking at includes, but is not limited to: weather (temperature and precipitation) the month of sample collection and the month before, the incidence rate of neuroinvasive disease (the more severe manifestation of WNV symptoms), the location (county/parish and state) that that sample was collected from (each 'sample' is basically representative of one "unit" or one individual virus, even though that's not really how it works since its a virus isolated from a secondary organism, typically a mosquito, and I would think that even within a single organism there could be multiple variants of the virus, but idk maybe I just need to go back and look at my notes because I have been confused about this before), the month and year of collection (a month to month pairwise comparison would also be tied to typical viral cycles and weather conditions whereas a year by year comparison will suggest a different story about WNV transmission patterns and diversification, I didn't really explain that super well but I will explain more about the transmission cycles of WNV below to clarify), and the ecoregion (which is a classification given to a region by the EPA based on the type of landcover). I possibly want to figure out a way to add a component about bird migratory patterns/the # of birds in that area at that time and I also want to add something perhaps about socioeconomic status, % landcover, urbanization/population density etc. but each of those variables are kind of limited with the amount of available information given the time span over which the samples were taken and the fact that they were also taken from multiple regions in the United States. I am using the database pathoplexus to download my sequences, roughly 300 sequences from Louisiana, Colorado, and New York and I/my undergrad mentee Riley selected these locations due to sample size (we wanted at least 50-100 samples from each location) and we wanted to capture samples across the gradient of neuroinvasive disease (NID) incidence/activity because the genetic underpinnings of NID that enables some strains of WNV to pass over the blood-brain barrier and not others is still unknown so we could look to see if any correlations exist possibly. These samples span several years and months within the year and are also collected from multiple parishes/counties throughout those states so hopefully we have captured enough variation across all of the factors that could potentially affect WNV to see patterns emerge. The other samples that I will be using for comparison (roughly 120) are from throughout Louisiana and were collected via the mosquito abatement program by the Louisiana Department of Health and stored at the Louisiana Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory. In order to actually get these sequences I have to do some molecular work because the samples are quite literally macerated mosquito guts, so in order to get the sequences I will have to do an RNA extraction, PCR, and then because I am on a budget I am going to do gel electrophoresis to confirm the presence of viral cDNA since that is cheaper than doing qPCR and paying for the probe, and then I will send off the cDNA PCR product to be Sanger sequenced. Currently I am still working on that and I have selected the samples that I want to use (an intentional and curated sample selection process was also done based on NID prevalence/incidence and trying to capture a decent distribution of locations and times) and I have performed extractions on them but I am just waiting on some other things and then I can do the PCR and gel on my samples in hopefully the upcoming weeks.


Once I have all of my sequences and all of the accompanying information for my analysis, I will be constructing a phylogenetic tree (using muscle in AliView to align and then FigTree to construct the tree itself and then R to tweak it) and then doing some sort of analysis to see how strongly different variables structure the diversification processes. I am thinking of using an Integrated nested Laplace approximation, which is (according to Wikipedia) "a method for approximate Bayesian inference based on Laplace's method." I am not super sure that that's the best method, but I also am not there yet so it's okay.


Okay anyway, that's basically it and I am not sure if you read my previous post (probably not because probably no one even will read this) but I need to actually work on job applications now since they are due today and its almost 3 and so now I am stressed. Anyway, I will attach/paste my NSF-GRFP proposal because it's the more polished description of my project and probably more coherent (also just realized I said I would go into more detail about the transmission cycle of WNV but never did, basically its just back and forth between mosquitoes and birds and then sometimes humans and other mammals get it) but also has more jargon. Here it is (please don't copy it):


Uncovering the drivers of genetic diversity of West Nile virus throughout Louisiana 

Introduction: West Nile virus (WNV) is a zoonotic arbovirus (arthropod-borne virus) capable of infecting vertebrate hosts, particularly humans, horses, birds, and crocodilians.1,2 The transmission cycle occurs between ornithophilic mosquitoes, the principal vector of WNV, and birds, the primary amplifying host or reservoir. Mosquitoes infected with WNV may incidentally transmit the virus via blood feeding to mammals and other vertebrates, which are dead-end hosts.2 While the majority of human cases remain subclinical or asymptomatic, some WNV infections develop into neuroinvasive disease (NID), which is accompanied by severe symptoms which may include meningoencephalitis and in some cases, death.1 Different strains of WNV have variable virulence and neuroinvasion capabilities, which affects the ability of that strain to cause disease outbreaks and the extent of pathogenesis.1 Additionally, environmental and anthropogenic factors–including precipitation rate, ambient temperature, community ecology, type of land cover, and urbanization, amongst other extrinsic factors–influence the incidence rate and transmission patterns of WNV.1,3,4,5

The first WNV outbreak in humans in North America occurred in New York in 19993,4 and was accompanied by the mass mortality of birds near the epicenter of the outbreak.6 WNV subsequently spread throughout North America. Though the role of birds as an amplifier of WNV is well documented, it is not understood whether migratory birds played a role in introducing WNV to non-endemic regions.6 Since its introduction to the United States, WNV has been the leading cause of arboviral human disease, and as of 2021, it accounts for 95% of all reported NID cases attributable to arboviruses.7 Despite the wide reaching effects of WNV, we don’t presently understand the population ecology of WNV in terms of effective population sizes and gene flow. Thus, uncovering the intracontinental transmission patterns and the extrinsic and intrinsic properties that place a population at risk for a WNV outbreak is critical for disease management and prevention.

Aim 1: Characterize the genetic diversity of WNV in Louisiana (LA) relative to North America to test the “Migrant Bird as Introductory Host” hypothesis.8 LA provides an ideal study location of WNV due to its hot, humid subtropical climate positioned within the Mississippi Flyway, a major bird migratory route. These characteristics make LA particularly vulnerable to WNV and a prime candidate for the analysis of WNV genetic diversity across distance and ecosystem types. Throughout LA, parishes collect samples of mosquito pools to surveil the local mosquito populations for arboviruses. I will select a representative subset of these samples, aiming to capture samples from parishes with high and low positive pools and from parishes with high and low incidence rates of NID, samples from each ecoregion (defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as regions with a similar set of abiotic and biotic characteristics) in LA, and samples from each geographic region throughout LA, all spanning multiple years. To inform this sample selection process I will use the West Nile Virus Weekly Reports11 and a map of the Ecoregions of Louisiana published by the USEPA.12 I will then perform whole genome sequencing (WGS) of WNV from these samples. From the sequenced isolates in combination with WNV sequences sampled throughout North America retrieved from Pathoplexus,13 an open-source database of human viral pathogen genomic data, I will construct a phylogenetic tree of WNV diversity using BEAST14 and a maximum-likelihood tree with 1000 bootstraps using IQ-TREE.15 I will then identify migratory bird routes and seasonal bird density utilizing BirdCast live bird migration maps,16 Birds of the World,17 and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility.18 I will then analyze this data for any specific genetic variants of WNV throughout North America along the migratory routes to determine whether there are patterns of genetic diversification that suggest WNV transmission is mediated by migratory birds. Hypothesis 1: Generally, I expect to observe trends of WNV strain similarity along North-South gradients, following the direction of seasonal bird migration. More specifically, I expect strains isolated from LA to be the most genetically similar to strains isolated from the Midwest, particularly the Great Lakes region. I expect this because both LA and the Midwest lie along the Mississippi Flyway and are near large bodies of water. This result would support the “Migrant Bird as Introductory Host” hypothesis. 

Aim 2: Understand how ecological interactions and anthropogenic factors affect WNV genetic diversity and incidence in LA. Upon constructing the phylogeny of WNV, I will use an integrated nested Laplace approximation model19 to elucidate how genetic diversity and incidence rates of WNV compare to weather patterns throughout LA, relative bird abundance, ecoregion, urbanization, and socioeconomic status (SES) across spatiotemporal gradients. I will obtain temperature and precipitation data from the Louisiana Agriclimatic Information System,20 species-specific bird abundance data from eBird,21 urbanization data from the United States Census Bureau,22 and use maps of adjudicated properties and Parish Employment and Wages in Louisiana23 as a proxy for SES. Hypothesis 2: I expect parishes with greater precipitation rates and higher temperatures, a greater density of flocking bird species, more urbanization, and lower SES to exhibit higher genetic diversity and greater overall WNV incidence. Additionally, I expect these environmental factors to coincide with the late summer months and to occur in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain (wetland) ecoregions, with ecoregion being the most significant factor structuring WNV genetic diversity in LA.

Resources and Mentorship: I will be performing my research at the Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine with the co-mentorship of Dr. Rebecca Christofferson, who specializes in patterns of viral transmission, and Dr. Jeremy Brown, who specializes in phylogenetic reconstruction. I will obtain my samples of WNV from the Louisiana Diagnostic Disease Laboratory.

Intellectual Merit: Understanding the ecological factors that influence WNV transmission and viral amplification is critical to the effective implementation of management strategies. Most WGS of WNV in North America are of strains isolated from the northeastern United States24 so it is critical to supplement this information from isolates collected throughout North America, including LA. Additionally, understanding the driving factors of WNV genetic diversification processes will advance fundamental knowledge about other arboviruses as well.

Broader Impacts: Currently, few parishes regularly sample mosquito populations for arbovirus testing and sampling is typically done as a reactionary measure or performed sporadically. A greater understanding of the transmission patterns, genetic diversity, and the effects of ecological drivers on WNV activity can inform resource partitioning efforts to develop actionable plans pertaining to risk management and arboviral surveillance. (1) Community Education to Reduce Mosquito-Borne WNV Risks: I will implement community educational programs to disseminate information about preventative measures for mitigating mosquito activity, the transmission cycles of WNV, and specific risk factors that may make individuals more vulnerable to NID. Simply removing waste that accumulates water and other mosquito breeding sites can reduce the abundance of the mosquito vectors of WNV, thus reducing risk. (2) Citizen Science Program to Enhance Mosquito Sampling and Optimize WNV Surveillance: I will develop a citizen science program to address a lack of consistent mosquito pool sampling and to establish standardized sampling protocols that aim to optimize resources based on the results of this study and previous WNV surveillance data. These citizen science collections can be incentivized in regions where WNV activity is the greatest. These citizen science WNV surveillance programs and community led abatement efforts are rooted in “One Health” principles, which seeks to optimize the health of the environment, humans, and animals. These programs will promote environmental justice and equity in underserved communities, seeking to remedy some of the underlying factors for heightened WNV risk and providing public engagement in science that directly benefits the community.



1Donadieu et al. Viruses (2013). 2Habarugira et al. Pathogens (2020). 3Christofferson et al. Virol J (2010). 4Petersen et al. JAMA (2013). 5de Jesús Crespo et al. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health (2021). 6Rappole et al. Emerg Infect Dis. (2000). 7Fagre et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2023). 8Mancuso et al. Viruses (2022). 9Louisiana Department of Health, West Nile Virus Weekly Reports (2022–2024). 10Daigle et al. USEPA (2006). 11Pathoplexus (2024). 12Suchard et al. Virus Evolution (2018). 13Minh et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. (2020). 14Dokter, A. M. BirdCast, live migration map (2022-2024). Cornell Lab of Ornothology. 15Billerman et al. Birds of the World, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology (2022). 16GBIF.org (2022-2024). 17Schrödle & Held, Environmetrics (2010). 18Louisiana Agriclimatic Information System (2022-2024), LSU AgCenter 19eBird, Cornell Lab of Ornithology (2021). 20List of 2020 Census Urban Areas in the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas, Federal Register (2022). 21Parish Employment and Wages in Louisiana, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 22Hyeon et al. Front Vet Sci. (2023).

  • caitlinrandall2020
  • Jan 17
  • 4 min read

So, I officially applied to one graduate program (the Marine Science and Conservation program at Duke for the Wong Lab) and I reached out to a couple of other PI's whose labs I was interested in but none of them were currently looking for students so I only applied to the one program at Duke. I know I want to get my PhD because I feel like in order to actually get stuff done with research you have to devote several years to a project in order to really get to know the ins and out of your research topic and yeah there are other reasons why I would just rather get my PhD right away instead of getting my masters first. The only caveat is that a PhD does take significantly more time, which is also a pro given the aforementioned point of why I don't want a masters however it's just a bigger commitment so I would not want to apply to a degree program for a lab that I am not extremely enthusiastic about in terms of both research and living location, even though I know that stuff is flexible but you get my point hopefully. The other caveat (so I guess there isn't only one lol, and this one I feel like is an even bigger caveat) is that getting a PhD will in a sense disqualify me from other positions that I think I would enjoy having even if only for a few years prior to pursuing my PhD and then a "real" big girl job/career that I would be 'locked in' to (not actually but typically you don't work seasonal jobs here, there and everywhere with a PhD). I do think it would be beneficial for me and also just fun to do to work some seasonal jobs that are research adjacent but also more conservation based and just utilize that as a means to explore myself/my interests and explore the world around me and meet new people and do cool things that I am passionate about and learn about more things that I could do long-term.


However .... in spite of all of this reasoning about what to do with my future, I emailed back Dr. Wong to see if I could possibly interview with her/tour Duke in person and she said I wasn't being considered for an interview so not going to lie I am kind of bummed because I also really do like what her lab does and I like the little community there and the Duke Marine Laboratory and it just seems like a place that I would really enjoy living and research that I would really enjoy doing. I am not too too bummed though because I know that if it was meant for me then it would be, kind of going back to the saying that goes like "desire is the root of all unhappiness" (I know I probably butchered that). But basically, I am like darn but I know that its okay and I am okay living with the uncertainty of what I will be doing next and I find it quite exciting, especially given its the start of a brand new year. Last year at this time I didn't know what I will be doing and I just assumed I would be in the same place and almost bought a gym membership with a one year commitment and then I was like wait a minute and I cancelled it and I am glad that I did because I spent the second half of the year living in Louisiana. Anyways, even though I was kind of rejected there is still a chance that I am offered admission which is still exciting and good, but as my friend Bridget says, I am not attached to any outcome. Whatever will be will be. Therefore, I am now looking for jobs and writing nonstop cover letters (not actually I've written like two but I have also been doing other stuff related to my actual research project) and there is actually two jobs that I am supposed to be applying to right now and working on the cover letters for but I am procrastinating by writing this blog post. I also realized that I never really explained my project, so I will do so in a following blog post but just briefly.


Anyways, the two jobs I am applying to right now is Marine Biologist (ASM) for this company and I am pretty qualified regarding the qualifications they provided and the job description, but the job post said to write a cover letter detailing my sea and fish experience and I don't even know what that really means but I guess I will just write something. I am also kind of worried because I will be on a boat for multiple days at a time, probably with men I don't really know or trust, and I would probably be the only science person so they could judge me or be mean to me. I don't think so though, at least I hope not. I do think it's a pro though that I will be on trips that could be up to 14 days in a row and for each day you get paid for 12 hours (even though you are on the boat constantly) but that's not bad, I feel like I would rather work a lot all at once and it also just seems like a cool job, like I bet I would see some cool creatures. The other job I am applying to is Accessible Wildland Trails Research Intern, which is actually less applied to like biological research and is more about improving accessibility to trails (specifically I think for disabled people) and that is so cool and awesome but also the job like doesn't really pay that great but also I get free housing so not bad. Okay anyways, I am supposed to go have lunch now so bye, but my website is linked to my CV so if any of the potential employers see this, please hire me!

  • caitlinrandall2020
  • Aug 8, 2024
  • 2 min read

Just to provide some background, the first 2 weeks of the LAGNiAppE program consisted of research bootcamp, followed by a week attending the Evolution conference in Montreal, Canada, followed by one more week of research bootcamp prior to joining our individual labs and embarking upon our research projects (I'm not entirely sure embarking is the right word in this context, but it feels right so just go with it). For the first three weeks, no one knew which mentor they were paired with, so it was pretty scary for someone like me who likes to know what is going on at all times.


Anyhow, I am now writing firmly from the second half of the last week research bootcamp, so that means I know which mentors I have been paired with. Drumroll please ...







Dr. Jeremy Brown and Dr. Rebecca Christofferson!


See their websites below for your own exploration:




None of the other scholars have co-mentors, nor have I ever had co-mentors, so I am not entirely sure what to expect but I am excited nonetheless. As per the wording in the email I had received notifying me of who my mentors are, "This pairing will give Caitlin the opportunity to explore her interests, as Dr. Christofferson is an expert in the emergence and transmission of viruses, while Dr. Brown offers a strong sense of community within the Department of Biological Sciences and will work closely in the project." I still do not know what my project is yet, but I am really pleased with these mentors and am super excited to get started hopefully learning more about viruses.


I guess I was a little too excited to learn more about viruses though, because I also have COVID right now, so I guess I am getting a little first hand refresher course on viruses. Yay! (sarcasm) I was going strong not having COVID following the Evolution conference in spite of 5 people I know of contracting COVID after attending the conference (no harm, no foul on behalf of them or the Evolution conference, unfortunately this is the nature of extremely large gatherings such as an international conference on an incredibly broad topic). However, I got that Friday off from work (originally supposed to be Thursday and Friday but due to travel delays I got back on Friday) and then promptly boarded another plane, flew home, got home at 1:00 am and then spent ~24 hours at home before getting in my '06 Mini Cooper (Mr. Cooper) and drove to Louisiana from Rhode Island with my dad. I truthfully think that last part just put too much of a strain on my body because even though driving seems likes just sitting in one spot for however long, it actually requires a great deal of mental concentration and effort for me and is quite fatiguing. Had I not driven, I might have been fine, but I am fortunate to be able to participate via Zoom and for an understanding program coordinator who is allowing and encouraging me to take the time to rest and recover.


Anyway, I have been taking this time to 1.) sleep and 2.) look into different grad schools accepting graduate students 3.) sleep.


Contact
Information

Department of Biological Sciences

Life Sciences Building, Louisiana State University 

Baton Rouge, LA

70820

(401) 743-8787

  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • X

Anyone and everyone who is in interested in the science I have performed and my journey into research, please contact me! I would love to connect with more scientists and to gain additional perspectives about how science impacts you. If you are an aspiring scientists wondering how to break into the seemingly impenetrable world of science, I strongly encourage you to contact me and I will help you in every way that I can and try to connect you with the appropriate resources. I was in your place not too long ago! Additionally, P.I.'s with open PhD positions are also encouraged to reach out to me as I am interested in applying to graduate school for the following year (2025). Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions, comments or concerns as well!

bottom of page